![]() |
Everyone is talking about how to innovate for the future. But, is there actually value in looking to our past to better understand how we have even come to think about what innovation really means? An article published in the MIT Sloan Management Review magazine back in 1984 outlines some interesting definitions of product quality (Transcendent, Product-Based, User-Based, Manufacturing-Based and Value-Based)¹. Essentially, each definition has a valid justification for why it drives quality. For example, if we take the example of a common product, such as bed sheets, the product-based definition (which “views quality as precise and measurable”¹) may suggest that the higher the thread count, the higher the quality. Whereas the user-based definition (which focuses on “the degree to which a specific product satisfies the wants of a specific consumer”¹) may suggest that a higher thread count without consideration of other features—texture, color, customization, how they are bundled with other bed accessories, etc.—may affect its perceived quality value. The article emphasizes why the existence of multiple (and sometimes conflicting) definitions are critical to driving the best possible outcome for all stakeholders.
![]() Chago Perez-Kolk is shaping the future of EMC’s product quality and innovation through his leadership role on EMC’s Total Customer Experience team.
I recently met with Chago (Santiago) Perez-Kolk, Senior Director of Quality on EMC’s Total Customer Experience team, to learn more about EMC’s approach to product quality, how it has evolved and what it will take to ensure the company maintains its leadership position in the next era of technological change, especially with the advent of digital technologies and more sophisticated ways to analyze and act on data. Here are the three key areas Chago believes companies should focus their efforts to deliver better product quality and drive long-term innovation. 1) REALLY listen to the customer.
![]() Targeted User Groups and 1-on-1 customer deep dives are a valuable way to collect feedback and share updates on how the company is making products better for those specific accounts / populations.
2) Push organizational boundaries and begin to tie data pieces together in new ways.In the past, physical and figurative boundaries could divide teams and vital data. This could inhibit our ability to serve our customers. With EMC’s successful establishment of a company-wide “Data Lake” in 2015, we are on our way to a new level of collaboration, centered on the needs of the customer.
![]() Through the company’s Data Lake and a more collaborative data-sharing culture, EMC can bring together diverse data sets (services, sales, operations, product reliability, etc.) to explore new trends to drive a more personalized customer experience.
3) Fix existing problems (and there will always be problems), but in parallel, plan for the future to prevent them from happening in the first place.We invest a significant amount of time addressing reactive issues—fixing software bugs, dealing with key performance metrics such as system availability rates, etc. We can’t stop doing this work. However, customers equally expect companies to use data to be more predictive and prescriptive—to look at macro trends across the customer base as well as individual experiences and be able to anticipate quality issues, identify which customers may be more prone to risk, and have the right tools and processes in place to take proactive action.
SummaryThe future of product innovation cannot happen if we neglect the lessons brought forth by our history. Having an appreciation for how product quality may be perceived by different stakeholders—both within and outside your organization—is an important piece of how you achieve what ultimately matters most—delivering on your promise to customers. Learn More About Product Quality & Innovation At EMC World 2016!
If you have thoughts on this blog or how your organization approaches quality innovation, please leave a comment below. __________ ¹Reference Source: What Does “Product Quality” Really Mean?, MIT Sloan Management Review, David A. Garvin, Fall 1984 The post The Future of Product Innovation Starts With the Past appeared first on InFocus. |
